Movie Review – Halloween II

September 8, 2009 at 9:46 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher | 8 Comments
Tags:

By Sam Chrisopher

Rating: ½ out of 5 Stars

Why?!? Why did Rob Zombie have to do this? I love the guy—well, in all fairness, I don’t really know him, but I love a lot of things in his public persona that I at least think I know. I love his music for the most part. I LOOOOOOVE the fact that he is a true horror fan. MTV Cribs… another lame offering from M-indless T-eleV-ision. The only one I ever watched (by choice) was the one of Zombie’s house, and I only watched that because of all the cool horror stuff I thought he’d have. And he does have a massive collection of old horror—something I find very commendable. I liked House of 1,000 Corpses, which I thought was weird and humorous enough to be enjoyable, but I thought The Devil’s Rejects was humorless and lame. The main characters in this sequel were just too cardboard for me to ever care what happened to them, and the situations (let me hit “Skinny Dude” with a board and I promise you he will not be getting up) were just too unbelievable and contrived.

Then he remade Halloween. He started with the stated intention of taking all the magic out of the story. In other words, he was going to make it basically a character study of a serial killer, nothing more. I wasn’t too thrilled with the sound of that but I thought I’d give it a shot. I actually liked the beginning of the film, and then most of the rest until Michael returned to Haddonfield. That was when the wheels came completely off. If there was no magic, how could Michael find his sister? How would he have the first clue where to look? Why was he following people all over the place? He followed one chick to where Laurie (his sister) was babysitting… then followed her all the way back to the house where she was babysitting so he could kill her there. And don’t get me started on the end of the picture. The last 15-20 minutes is some of the lamest stuff I’ve ever seen on film. Until now.

I hope I’ve made it clear above that I hate what I have to do here, but I have to be honest as well as fair. Tell you what, though, let me be fair first. I know that this is really a kind of riff on the original Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Myers but I have to give Zombie a little credit for trying something different. There’s not much that can be done in horror today that would be completely original, and as I said above this doesn’t fit that category. But he did at least attempt something creative with the film. It ended up being kind of Ed Wood-ian—there were points in this film where I firmly believed the next shot was going to be stock footage of a buffalo stampede, ala Glen or Glenda—but I do give credit for the attempt. The whole thing with Sherrie Moon Zombie in the white dress and the white horse just didn’t work out. And he did say he wanted to make it more violent than his first Halloween—I think he made that grade.

Now that I’ve handled the nicety: I really wanted to stand and scream at the screen how angry I was that I was wasting my time and money watching this dreck but I didn’t want to wake the two or three other people in the theater. This is the second week of release on a Friday night and I doubt there were ten people in that theater. There was a group in front of us: a heavily-tattooed man and woman with two kids who looked to be six or seven-years-old (what goes through a parent’s mind to bring little kids to a film like this?). They got up and left halfway through the movie. Starts off with Michael being loaded into the meat wagon… y’know, I don’t really want to relive this. I tried and tried, but this was like… like… well, I’m not sure what I can really compare it to. It’s not the worst thing I’ve ever seen but it’s on the short list. I didn’t even like the music—other than Nights in White Satin. And Zombie just makes the most unsympathetic characters I’ve ever seen. Even in Halloween, I never cared about anyone in the film other than Michael’s mother and Danny Trejo’s character. Everyone else you either just want to fast-forward to the death scene or watch them die three or four times.

I know I haven’t said much about the actual story. If you really need that kind of thing: Michael Myers isn’t dead. He wanders around chasing his sister and slaughtering a slew of people we’re probably all better off without anyway. That’s pretty much all you need to know—except that those two sentences are much better than sitting through the twelve hour movie (or maybe it just felt that long). Matter of fact, the only thing I can think of this weekend that was worse than watching this awful movie was being told that they’ve already decided to make ANOTHER one: Halloween 3-D! YES!

You’ve been warned…

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek: Nemesis

August 19, 2009 at 6:46 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Star Trek | 2 Comments
Tags:

(Part of our ongoing series covering all aspects of the Star Trek franchise)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 2 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek - Nemesis (Widescreen Edition)This film, the last to star the crew of the Enterprise-E, was released in 2002. The product of screenwriter John Logan (from an idea conceived jointly with producer Rick Berman) and director Stuart Baird, neither of whom had any history with Trek, ST: Nemesis, this is the only film in the franchise not to open at #1 in the US box office and very nearly lost money, earning only about $67 Million worldwide on a budget of about $60 Million. Jonathan Frakes, who had directed the two previous installments as well as played Will Riker with this cast for the entire run of the teleseries and through the films, wasn’t asked to direct this one, and has said he would have and that the film would have benefited from his direction over Baird’s. Hard to argue given the result.

The story: The Romulan Senate is slaughtered and the Enterprise-E discovers a ridiculously named Data-type android, B-4, on a desert planet near the Romulan Neutral Zone. The ship is also ordered (by Admiral Kathryn Janeway, no less, in the best cameo the film could really have) on a diplomatic mission to Romulus where they find the new Praetor Shinzon is actually a clone of Picard raised on Remus. Then a bunch of stuff happens and Riker and Troi finally get married (I guess they had to wait for Worf’s gnaw marks on her to heal). Riker also finally accepts a promotion. Oh, yeah, and someone very important dies. Sort of.

Believe me, I understand the above is a short rehash but… this film really irritates me. I didn’t get to see it at the theater because it only lasted a couple of weeks locally, and then only a week at the dollar theater. I finally rented it and didn’t think it was all that bad. But that’s because I tend to view Trek with blinders on, at least at first. This was the last film with the Next Gen crew, very likely the last time we would ever see them all together, and I knew that going in. So when I watched it—well, to misquote another sf franchise I don’t really care for—I wanted to believe! I wanted it to be good, so I willed myself not to see the flaws that I would never allow in another film. Picard’s clone runs Romulus?!? How many Trek writers—or even 15-year-olds—do you think could come up with a better plot device than that? Dorothy Fontana, Tracy Torme, Ann Crispin, Diane Duane, Peter David—any of these and a few hundred other people I could name would have come up with a better story than what we got here. Too bad Edward D. Wood Jr. wasn’t available! B-frakkin’-4?!? Come on!

Funny thing here is that I always say the first film, The Motionless Picture, is my least favorite of the films but I really think after seeing this one again that’s more a function of my not thinking much about that film for so much longer than this one. In other words, it’s not that I like this one better, it’s just that it hasn’t stuck in my craw as long, the wasted opportunity they had here. This could have been a great film. The Romulans are an interesting race that still hasn’t been explored to their fullest in the films and various series. The Klingons became the most interesting race in Trek with the advent of The Next Generation and Worf as a crewmember.  The Romulans could easily have supplanted the Klingons if only this film and the teleseries Enterprise (which featured the Romulans more extensively than any other ST series, despite the fact that the regular cast could never see one) had been handled better. But, in this film, instead of Romulan subversion and cunning we get a human’s clone conquering them in minutes.
But the worst thing this film did was end the franchise in such a way that no one (other than we hardcore Trekkies) would really miss it. Roger Ebert said that while watching it he realized that “Star Trek was over for me”—I doubt he would have said that if the story had been worth watching. All anyone I ever talk to seems to remember is Data’s Superman impersonation—they rarely even remember why it happened, what was going on, what it led to. I’ve never been a fan of handing the franchise over to people who don’t know it and this film is certainly a reinforcement of that thought process. Frakes has said that if he had been in charge of the film it would have done better at the box office and, as I said in the first paragraph, it’s hard to argue with that. Not saying that knowledge of Trek without knowledge of storytelling is good but there are many people (some of whom I mentioned above) who have an abundance of both and I see nothing wrong with making an effort to hire them before someone with no investment in this storied franchise.

Give your rating of Star Trek: First Contact and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek: Insurrection

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek: Insurrection

August 12, 2009 at 7:09 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Summer of Star Trek | 2 Comments
Tags:

(Continuing our Summer of Star Trek series)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek - InsurrectionAfter the great success of Star Trek: First Contact, producer Rick Berman and Paramount decided that, with the writing team of Moore and Braga busy with other projects, long-time TNG writer/producer Michael Piller would be the idea man for the next motion picture in the Trek franchise. Piller had previously turned down the opportunity to work on ST: Generations, and admitted to thinking First Contact was a little darker than he liked his Trek. He thought that Gene Roddenberry’s vision for Trek was to make people feel good about the future, that there was hope for us as a species in the future, and that the previous film had embraced a more nihilistic vision that may have been more in tune with Americans’ taste in sf of late but didn’t fit The Great Bird’s template for the series. Piller favored a “search for the Fountain of Youth” storyline, while Berman’s idea was to remake Joseph Conrad’s classic story “Heart of Darkness” (which was the basis for Coppola’s great film Apocalypse Now), kind of a TOS “The Omega Glory” meets TNG’s “The Wounded”. And there were, of course, problems with the script. In the first draft, Picard was to hunt down an old classmate who was gunning for Romulans while the crew of the Enterprise grew younger and younger due to the effects of the space they had to travel through, in the next version the ship was tracking down a rogue Data, with Picard eventually having to “kill” the android, only to find a way to reactivate him later in the film.

But Patrick Stewart objected. Sort of. I’ve always read that he objected, but from what he himself said that he told Berman and Piller I’ve never really been able to see much conflict with what they had down. According to Stewart, he said he thought the captain should be in the middle of the action, that the crew should have some fun in a lighter film than the last, and that Picard should have a romantic relationship. Two of those three things were already on tap in the scripts proposed. Piller then came up with Picard and crew having to rebel against a faction of Starfleet officers working with an alien race to steal the homeworld of a race of “children”. But it was decided that Picard’s motivations for going against orders in this script were rather flimsy (I guess it is ridiculous to think that a Starship Captain would oppose a shadow cadre of Starfleet personnel just because they were going to not only violate the Prime Directive but also steal a planet from a bunch of children; what was Piller thinking?) so the Baku, the “children”, were changed to adults and Picard was shown to be romantically involved with one of them.

The story: A peaceful scene on an idyllic alien world is suddenly shattered by phaser fire. This attack is shown to be the work of Data, who then turns the phaser on the cloaked Federation outpost filled with anthropologists and exobiologists sent to study the Ba’ku, the alien race of this world. Admiral Dougherty then calls the Enterprise and asks for Data’s schematics and any other info Picard can give him but tells Picard that a visit from the Enterprise is unwarranted. So… well you know Picard has to go there. As the Enterprise passes through the “Briar Patch” several effects are noticed through the crew—Geordi’s ocular implants begin to bother him, Riker and Troi’s earlier feelings for each other begin to resurface, Worf experiences acne. Data is captured and found to have been attacked by a race called the Son’a, whom the Federation has allied with even though they make Ketracel White, the drug the Founders use to keep the Jem’Hadar in line, and the Federation is currently embroiled in the Dominion War. Picard is also informed by the leader of the Ba’ku, Anij, that they knew something was wrong with Data’s positronic brain but weren’t sure how to fix it, which tells our heroes that this race is advanced but has turned their back willfully on technology. They also find that a cloaked Federation ship is hidden on the surface for the purpose of surreptitiously sneaking the Ba’ku off their homeworld. Turns out that due to metaphasic radiation ringing the planet it is a veritable fountain of youth and some in the Federation have decided that the way of life for the 600 people living there is expendable in order to reap the benefits of this fountain. Picard and crew refuse to allow this transparent violation of the Prime Directive, and that’s before the Big Reveal later on.

Two things about this film. First, it is my favorite of the TNG-centric motion pictures despite the fact that it is, after all, little more than a two-part episode of the series. I thought the same thing about Generations. I think it has to do with the look of the films more than their content. Both Generations and Insurrection just look like episodes, with the CGI and the quality of the picture itself they just appear to be episodes of the tv show. With Generations that was kind of annoying (although not even in my Top Five of problems with that film), with this one it just didn’t bother me. I guess I’m just more interested in the story and how the characters interact with each other than how cool the sfx looks, especially when it comes to Trek.


Download 25 FREE songs at eMusic.com!
The other thing I can say is how frightening it is to read some of the comments people make about this film. I am frequently aghast at the callous disregard some people have for the rights of others, and those same people’s willingness to violate any rules or laws if they can justify it as being for what they perceive as the “greater good”. I’ve read in places where people have actually suggested that Dougherty should have just exterminated the Ba’ku when Picard wrecked his plan to take them away without their knowledge, or at least beam them to a ship and lock them away in the brig. I can say I didn’t really get why Federation medical personnel couldn’t just experiment with metaphasic radiation on their own with the Ba’ku still living on the planet (I know Dougherty explained it but I just can’t believe the Feddies couldn’t synthesize it), but that doesn’t mean it’s all right just to destroy a people’s way of life and steal their property. And that’s even without my mentioning that we really don’t know if they can replicate the radiation’s effects. I mean, how long do you think they’ve studied the “Earth” they found in the TOS ep “Miri” or the “Earth” they found in the TOS ep “The Omega Glory” without finding a way to make those longevity systems work anywhere else? (I know what McCoy said in TOS but surely medical science has advanced in the 80-odd years since, not to mention the fact that he was speaking after a mere few hours of research.)

Give your rating of Star Trek: First Contact and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek: First Contact

Next – Star Trek: Nemesis

Weekly Update – Bryan Singer to Work with SyFy; Ridley Scott to Direct Brave New World; V to Debut Earlier

August 10, 2009 at 7:43 am | In Movie Reviews, Paul S. White, Ratings Results | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , ,

Bryan Singer to work on SyFy Mini-Series: The X-Men director is planning on working with SyFy on a six-hour mini-series. Described as a Da Vinci Code-type adventure, it will focus on the legends of the Mayan calendar predicting the end of the world. According to Singer, the mini-series “will explore whether we are truly alone in the universe and other related mysteries”. This will be Singer’s second partnership with the cable channel, after working with them on Triangle in 2005.


Over 2,000 Vacation Destinations!
Ridley Scott to Direct Brave New World: Legendary director Ridley Scott is keeping busy these days. After the announcement that he would direct the upcoming prequel to Alien, word has come out that he will produce and direct a movie based on Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. He will work in collaboration with Leonardo DiCaprio who will also star in the movie. Huxley’s book was written in 1931 and predicted a dystopian, consumerist society several hundred years in the future. Ridley Scott has already had experience working on dystopian visions as he directed one of the most recognized films in that vein, Blade Runner.

ABC’s V Jumps to Fall: The alphabet network’s re-imagining of the 1980’s mini-series/series will get an earlier start than first announced. V, originally scheduled to bow in January, will debut on Tuesday November 3rd which will also become its regular night going forward. Previous to this announcement, no Science Fiction and Fantasy shows were scheduled for Tuesday nights. And this will now give ABC three nights in a row of genre programming, as Eastwick will air on Wednesdays and Flash Forward will air on Thursdays.

Day One To Have Limited Run? NBC’s new post-apocalyptic drama does not bow until January 2010, but the network is already talking about its end. NBC president of prime time entertainment Angela Bromstad said in a recent press conference that they have “ always looked at Day One as a big event . . . and not necessarily a show that would be an ongoing, returning show for a second season”. She did mention that if the series drew high enough ratings, it might return for more episodes. Also, despite early comparisons to CBS’s cancelled Jericho, this series follows the aftermath of an alien invasion, not a nuclear war.

Ratings Update: ABC’s new space soap opera Defying Gravity did not receive a warm welcome a week ago Sunday as its debut only managed to average a 1.1 rating in the 18-49 demographic over its initial two hours. It also only averaged about 3.7 million total viewers during that time. While those numbers would have been looked at as respectable on SyFy or Lifetime (either of which probably would have been a better home for the show), the broadcast networks expect better performance, even during the summer months. The second part of NBC’s disaster mini-series The Storm averaged a lower rating during that same Sunday time period but pulled in a higher total viewer count of around 4.1 million. In the hour prior, Merlin did slightly better pulling a 1.1 rating and just under 4.5 million viewers.

Previous Update:

August 3rd – Jericho Movie Still Possible; Ridley Scott to Direct Alien Prequel; Futurama Cast to Return

Did we miss something?  Have a tip or piece of news relating to Science Fiction and Fantasy that you would like to share?  Send it to us at mail@axiomsedge-scifi.com. If you have a blog or website, we will gladly link back to your original post for any news pieces you pass along.

Quick Hits – Angel, Fallen Angel, All Winners Comics, Destroyer, and More

August 8, 2009 at 5:26 am | In Comic Book Reviews, Movie Reviews, Quick Hits, Sam Christopher | Leave a Comment
Tags:

By Sam Christopher

panic_in_year_zeroEarlier this week I viewed for the first time Panic in the Year Zero (1962), a sf tale about one family’s battle for survival during a nuclear holocaust. Ray Milland stars in and directs this low budget, very realistic picture. Milland’s family—the average for the time, a man, his wife, with one daughter and a son (played in this case by Frankie Avalon)—leaves their home in Los Angeles for a camping trip into the mountains when the Russians (actually I don’t think they ever really say where the strike comes from but given the time I think it’s obvious) nuke New York, DC, Chicago, and LA. There is, of course, a mass exodus from the city and Milland does what he feels he has to to keep his family safe. He makes decisions which are morally objectionable in polite society but seem necessary to keep his family safe during the period of lawlessness in the aftermath of the attacks. They buy up all the food they can from a grocer off the beaten path who hasn’t heard about the attacks yet; they attempt to buy guns from a hardware store but when the owner tells Milland he’ll have to wait a couple days for registration the latter steals the guns (although he does leave the guy payment). I really enjoyed this film, much more than I thought I would (especially since I would have sworn I’d seen it before—still not sure what film I was thinking of). It was realistic and interesting, with good characters and deliberately understated direction that sets the perfect tone for this story. I would give it 3 Stars out of Five.

And now to the comics…

This week starts out with Angel #24 and the first chap in a story starring Spike’s ex, Drusilla, plotted and partially scripted by “Dru” herself, Juliet Landau, with scripting help from Brian Lynch (Spike: After the Fall, Spiderman Unlimited). I love this story; I think my favorite part is either when Dr. Gray offers to move her from isolation so long as she promises not to “get aggressive” (and we all remember what a shy, timid soul Dru’s been in the past), or when Dru un-aggressively shows Dr. Luce the error of her ways. Not sure yet how this all fits in with The Fall, or if it does, and I would’ve liked to have seen a reference to the psychotic Slayer who was in a mental ward in LA as well (just might’ve been a cool little touch to have it mentioned), but all in all an excellent beginning to the story. And let’s not forget to mention how much the Franco Urru (Spike: After the Fall, Fallen Angel Reborn) art added to the book, solid as usual. Oh, and the photo gallery in the back is not to be missed. Ms. Landau has a fantastic set of gams.

And, since we’re starting with Angel, I guess we should mention also that Illyria guest stars in Fallen Angel Reborn #1 and 2 which is why I picked them up. I read all the original DC issues of Peter David’s Fallen Angel, and I still say she was where he wanted to go with the “Earth Angel” Supergirl, but I never read any of the IDW versions. I missed the first few issues and eventually just decided to let it go. I have thought from time to time of getting the trades in order to get caught up. However, this new series is one a new reader unfamiliar with Liandra and Bete Noire can get into easily. The story starts with a pitchman from the Hierarchy offering Illyria all she had in the distant past if she would just do them the favor of killing Liandra and, although it is unspecified, no doubt destroying Bete Noire in the process, which has now been shown to be the center of the psyche of all the rest of the world. In other words, David’s words as spoken by Liandra herself, Bete Noire is “the city that shapes the world. What happens here is reflected in the events of the world, like rings rippling across a pond from a tossed stone”. The destruction of this focus point surely aid the Hierarchy in whatever their goals are. This great Peter David (Incredible Hulk, Young Justice) story is aided by excellent JK Woodward (Eureka, Zombie Tales) art, which is perfect for the tone of this tale.

My only made two purchases from Marvel this week—I stopped buying Hulk after the disastrous #600 and everything else was all that Dark Reign crap and Spiderman, which I gave up on after Mephisto… well, let’s just say I thought that story was “Clone Saga bad” and it was the last straw.  The first was All Winners Comics 70th Anniversary Special #1. The new story, written by Karl Kesel (Superboy, Human Torch) with Steve Uy (JSA Classified, Iceman) artwork, gets off to a rocky start before settling down into a pretty good tale. The art, at first blush, just isn’t very good. It just doesn’t seem to fit a superhero motif. But by the end of this tale incorporating very modern sensibilities and team dynamics the pictures seem to show it as a perfect fit with the Timely Comics of the ‘40s. the reprints in this ish are “Winners All”, a prose story by Stan Lee (Nick Fury, Agent of Shield, Tales of Suspense) with an illustration by Jack Kirby (Journey into Mystery, The Mighty Thor) from All Winners Comics #2 in Fall 1941, and “Captain America: The Four Trials of Justice”, by an unknown writer and artist from All Winners Comics #12 in Fall ’44. They are both fun reads, as are the reprint ads, one for Captain America’s Sentinels of Liberty, the other for Captain America Comics and Marvel Mystery Comics. The second Marvel purchase was Destroyer #5, in which I really hated the ending, which is too bad because the beginning of this ish is wonderfully bent and funny. The series as a whole was fun, though, It’s still the only superhero work of Kirkman’s (The Walking Dead, Marvel Zombies) I like (never read Invincible, though, and I hear it’s very good). And I can’t say enough for the perfect Cory Walker (Invincible, Shadowpact) art, either.

The landmark series from Mark Waid (Amazing Spiderman, The Flash) and Peter Krause (Star Trek, Sable) continues with the 99 cent Irredeemable #5, priced low to attract new readers, and there’s also a trade out collecting the first four issues. Volt, Waid-World’s Black Lightning analogue, is funny, and he owes a serious debt to the now-evil Plutonian. But don’t worry, “Tony” makes sure he pays in full. Also, how evil could Superman be to the average person, even without ever leaving his Fortress? This ish holds that answer, as well. I have lauded this series since its premier and Waid and Krause have yet to disappoint. At every turn they delve unflinchingly into the depths a man who can do anything can sink to, although it does seem the Plutonian is looking for something, or waiting for something. Or maybe it’s as simple as it looks and he’s just toying with everyone in the belief that no one can harm him. Wherever they’re going with this myself and discerning readers everywhere will be glad to follow.

And how can we mention Irredeemable without mentioning its slightly “older brother” over at DC as The Mighty #7 hit the stands this week with an odd story. I’m sure this is important, and I know that Alpha manipulated the situation completely, but I have to wonder what happens if Cole had recorded the encounter with the terrorist and had someone who speaks the language listen to the tape later. I guess that would be impossible, though, since last ish showed us that Alpha’s fully aware of the Cole’s suspicions. Unsure about the end here, too; I just think it more likely that Alpha has staged even that in order to keep Gabriel off-balance. And what better way to keep Cole in line, if it comes to that, than to have what he loves most? Writers Peter J. Tomasi (Green Lantern Corps, Blackest Night: Tales of the Corps) and Keith Champagne (The Legion, What If) have once again deepened the mystery with the aid of that great nostalgic Chris Samnee (Blackest Night: Tales of the Corps, Daredevil: Blood of the Tarantula) art.

On the minus side of the ledger this week, I bought Doom Patrol #1 against my better judgment. This team, like the characters Hawkman and Atom, pops up every few years with a “new direction”, or a writer with a fresh take, and usually does just well enough to hang around for a few months before being cancelled. This time the title has writer Keith Giffen (Justice League Europe, Legion of Superheroes), who has handled teams very well in the past, working with artist Matthew Clark (Inhumans, Pantheon) so I thought I’d give it a shot. Not bad but not very impressive, either, really just average fare for these characters. The Metal Men backup—which also helped tip the scales toward my buying this title—was no great shakes, either. Again, not bad, and fun in its own way, but nothing that could carry a book. And since the opening act couldn’t do it either…

Other comics:

Buffy the Vampire Slayer #27- Not an Oz fan. He was all right at first on the show but that wore off rather quickly, and even making him a werewolf didn’t help me much. And nothing here’s making me like him better.

Final Crisis Aftermath #4- Still pretty good, but I don’t understand how Miller’s broken jaw and nose heal in, like a panel. I didn’t realize he was Logan’s other brother Darryl.

Justice League: Cry for Justice #2- The mystery deepens as all roads lead to Gotham and Captain Marvel and Supergirl enter the storyline.

North 40 #2- Weirder and weirder. Aaron Williams (PS 238, Zombie King) gives a good story but I can’t say enough about Fiona Staples’ (Proof, War Machine) art. It is just magnificent here, a perfect depiction of this Lovecraftian nightmare.

Star Trek: Alien Spotlight: Q- An all right story with all right art.

Superman: World of New Krypton #6- Told ya so! I know, I know—they say Zod looks bad and they don’t know if he’ll make it but come on, you know he will. Didn’t see the assassin running to Earth, though.

Previous Column:

Aug 1st – Justice Society, Wonder Woman, Blackest Night, Fantastic Four, and More

John J. Joex is looking for Comic Book Artists to collaborate on one or more ideas he has developed. Click here for more info.


Jack Kirby's Fourth World Omnibus, Vol. 1The Jack Kirby Store: Offering a comprehensive selection of compilations of The King’s work available on Amazon.com including the Fourth World, Fantastic Four, Kamandi, Thor, Captain America, The Eternals, and many more.

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek: First Contact

August 5, 2009 at 6:30 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Summer of Star Trek | 4 Comments
Tags:

(Continuing our Summer of Star Trek series)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek - First ContactImmediately after the release of Star Trek: Generations it was decided that another film, this one centering exclusively on the cast of the Star Trek: The Next Generation television series, should be made to coincide with the 30th Anniversary of the franchise as a whole. It was also decided that the creative team behind Generations, producer Rick Berman and writers Ronald D. Moore and Brannon Braga, would be placed in charge of the new film. Berman wanted a time travel story, Moore and Braga favored a new encounter with the Borg, a collective of cyborgs whose “race” is expanded through assimilation of unwary individuals of any species. It was eventually decided that both ideas would be combined. Berman’s thought was that the Borg would travel to the past to short-circuit the European Renaissance and would be replete with sword fights and tights (which Patrick Stewart refused to wear) but it was decided that might fall too easily into camp. Braga and Moore had the idea that the Borg would try and interfere with the first warp flight by Zephram Cochrane, thereby preventing humanity’s first contact with the Vulcans, and that was pretty much the idea that would eventually see film (there were many details that would change from the original idea to the finished product). A few well-known directors such as Ridley Scott, among others, were considered to direct but between their saying no and the feeling that some of them just didn’t know Star Trek it was finally settled that Jonathan Frakes would direct. So the stage was set.


The story: Captain Jean-Luc Picard awakes on the Enterprise-E from a nightmare involving his assimilation by the Borg. He is then told by an admiral that a Borg ship has been spotted heading to Earth, and the Enterprise is ordered to patrol the Neutral Zone rather than help defend Earth due to Picard’s perceived emotional distress with the Borg. The Enterprise, of course, hears that the battle is going badly and disobeys orders, saving the crew of the Defiant, which includes old crewmate Worf, on their way to Sector 001 (Earth). They arrive and Picard directs the remnants of the fleet to fire upon a seemingly insignificant section of the Borg Cube, which then explodes, a spherical ship escaping the conflagration at the last moment. The sphere opens a temporal rift and disappears into it, leaving behind an Earth populated entirely by Borg (the Enterprise is theorized to have survived the changes due to their proximity to the rift). The Enterprise follows the sphere into the rift and the crew find themselves in 2063, one day before the first recorded warp flight by humans. They destroy the sphere only to find that the Borg have gotten a toehold on the Enterprise itself. Shenanigans ensue.

This film was the first major use of the Borg since Picard’s assimilation in the fourth season ep, “The Best of Both Worlds”. The decision not to use them was borne of budget constraints on the show and the feeling that they might lose their fearsomeness due to overexposure (a thought that was apparently overcome by the fourth season of Star Trek: Voyager). It was also decided to make the conflict with the Borg a little more personal by giving them a “hive queen” who would be known only as the Borg Queen and be given a personality and a sense of individual identity. I still think this was a real mistake, despite the fact that the Queen is such a good villain. If they had had her there to usurp the role of leader for the Borg, in the same manner as Lore from the fifth season TNG ep “Descent”, that would have been better. The whole point of the Borg is that they were supposed to be a perfect, complete collective consciousness wherein every individual was nothing more than a cell in a much larger “single entity”. And that entity’s sole purpose was to find and assimilate technologies it did not already possess. Having a “queen” gives that entity a personification that it did not need, in my opinion, although I do understand it from a narrative standpoint, I guess; it certainly made the story more appealing to the masses.

Besides that, my only real problem with the film is why the Borg came to Earth in the first place. I’ve never understood the Borg’s fascination with humanity. They’ve assimilated people from the Federation before, Klingons, Vulcans, Romulans, humans, and they didn’t feel the need to rush to Romulus or Qo’noS or Vulcan, or any of a thousand other worlds between Earth and Borg space. But even that’s not really the problem I have: I don’t understand why the Borg came all the way to Earth in the first place before going into the past. They could have gone back three hundred years in the Delta Quadrant and then come to Earth in the 21st Century completely unopposed. (And that’s without my considering that they could keep going back into the past and updating the Borg of previous time periods so that the Borg of previous centuries would be completely unstoppable and would have expanded naturally all the way to the Alpha Quadrant. This, given the way they “evolve” and “discover” new technologies, would create a completely new and strange kind of “societal” Mobius strip, in which they would have to assimilate technologies they already have in order to have had it in the first place.)

I do have other problems with the film, but it was made to, one, show that the Next Gen cast of characters could carry a feature film on its own, and, two, to make a profit for the studio. It performed both of these functions very well. It was filmed on a budget of $46 million and made a total of $146 million worldwide. It was also very well received by the critics.

Give your rating of Star Trek: First Contact and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek: Generations

Next – Star Trek: Insurrection

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek: Generations

July 29, 2009 at 6:57 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Summer of Star Trek | 6 Comments
Tags:

(Continuing our Summer of Star Trek series)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 2 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek: GenerationsThe seventh film of the Trek franchise, and the first without even a glance-over by series creator Gene Roddenberry, who had died in ’91 right before the release of the last film to star the cast of TOS, was released in ’94 and starred the cast of the extremely popular Star Trek: The Next Generation TV show. TNG had stopped production after seven seasons to move into the more profitable film franchise in 1993 and this “maiden voyage” was fairly successful monetarily, with mixed critical results. It is an important film for the ST canon in that it gives us our final view of James Doohan as Scotty, plus the two captains of the Enterprise, Kirk and Picard, meet, and Kirk dies. Some would also say it’s important for paving the way for the Enterprise-E but I say that crashing the boat’s been done, and with a lot more style, in The Search for Spock—that, and we’ve seen the Enterprise-D blow up, like, a hundred times on TNG over the years (remember the ep “Cause and Effect” where the entire story centered on the D exploding over and over again?). It could have indeed been a true turning point for the character of Picard on finding out his brother and nephew—especially the young Rene—have died, but, as we’ll see in the remainder of this series of reviews, it seems a transient point that only matters in this film.

The story: Retired officers Kirk, Scott, and Chekov are on hand for the christening of the Enterprise-B, which had apparently planned to install everything Tuesday for the emergency today. The Enterprise has to save a couple of ships full of refugees, among them TNG’s Guinan and a scientist named Soran, from an anomaly that Soran appears eager to get back to. Meanwhile, Kirk has gone down to check on <insert technobabble here> and is evidently swept out into space when the compartment is ripped open. The scene then shifts to the holodeck of the Enterprise-D, where the Klingon Worf is being promoted. Three things of interest here: Picard gets some very bad news from Earth, Riker does something that nearly makes me like him (it was funny), and Data does something that earns him the ire of Dr. Crusher (that despite what Geordie says was also funny). Then we meet Soran again and the whole picture goes down the tubes, in large measure.

The main problem I had with this picture is that the whole Nexus thing, the plot device on which hangs the entire story of Kirk and Picard’s team-up, just doesn’t make any sense at all. It’s ostensibly a paradise that flies at random through the galaxy, a place which Soran and Guinan have been to before and for which Soran has decided to give everything everyone else owns to get back to ( yes, I do believe he was a politician in the 20th Century; El-Aurians are extremely long-lived and he obviously has the moral makeup for the job). Guinan tells Picard that she has tried for the past 80 years to forget her brief sojourn there, and that if Picard were ever to be taken there he would no longer care about her, his friends, his ship; nothing outside of the Nexus, which is the center of all love and joy in the Universe, a place of eternal happiness, will matter to him. Picard is, of course, taken into the Nexus and we see him just shake it off after, like, five minutes. He then goes to talk to Kirk, who, Guinan’s reflection still trapped in the Nexus (which is why I say that Kirk isn’t really dead, since anyone in the Nexus appears to always reside there) tells him, has just gotten there (from Kirk’s point-of-view). Of course, Kirk decides that he wants to leave after, like, five minutes. The two captains then go and… well, I’m sure that even if you haven’t seen it you already can guess what happens.

U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D Figurine: Collectible Star Trek Memorabilia

Available from Collectibles Today

This is a fun film to watch, and it is Trek. Those two things count for a lot, and can wash out some of the problems with the story in the film. The sections which dealt with Data’s emotion chip and Geordie’s visor being used as a spying device by Lursa and B’Etor (“He must be the only engineer in Starfleet who never goes to Engineering!”) are fun and necessary for both character development—in Data’s case—and story development—in Geordie’s. Unfortunately, even Kirk’s death is robbed of much of the impact it might have had by the lackluster battle with the mediocre villain Soran. The pattern of the story just can’t support some of the very good threads of storytelling that could have made up a beautiful fabric of a fine film.

One last thing. Leonard Nimoy declined to be in this film, which is a good thing since it got us one last chance to see James Doohan, and DeForest Kelley was too ill to be included, which is a bad thing (no offense to Walter Koenig) because we didn’t get one last farewell for Leonard McCoy. Not knowing the behind-the-scenes story when I saw this film, I always thought it odd to see Kirk and anyone other than Spock and McCoy on the bridge of the Enterprise-B.

Give your rating of Star Trek: Generations and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

Next – Star Trek: First Contact

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

July 22, 2009 at 6:30 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Summer of Star Trek | 3 Comments
Tags:

(Continuing our Summer of Star Trek series)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 3 ½ out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek VI - The Undiscovered CountryAfter the critical and financial flop of The Final Frontier, the ST franchise looked to be dead. But with the 25th anniversary of the original show looming—and with the continued success of The Next Generation on television—it was decided that the original crew should get another shot. Producer Harve Bennett brought back the idea from what was to be the fourth film, thinking that a prequel set at Starfleet Academy could possibly rejuvenate the film franchise by rejuvenating the characters. (Interestingly, in Bennett’s storyline, Kirk’s father was to have disappeared in an accident during an experiment by Montgomery Scott, which means George Kirk was the original “Admiral Archer’s beagle”, if you remember from the new film.) This idea was, of course, roundly denounced by the original cast and the fan base, which followed the lead of the actors. After his idea was rejected, Bennett left the franchise. Then Walter Koenig submitted an idea in which the entire crew save for McCoy and Spock die by the end (for more on this read Koenig’s excellent autobiography Warped factors: A Neurotic’s Guide to the Universe), which was also rejected by the studio. Finally, Leonard Nimoy came up with an idea that embraced the news of the time, asking, “What if The Wall came down between the Klingons and the Federation?” He and Nick Meyer—who was tabbed to direct so as not to ruffle Shatner’s feathers—then hammered out the story with some help and Meyer and Denny Martin Flinn worked out a script, which ST patriarch Gene Roddenberry hated (more on that later).

The story: The Klingon moon Praxis, which is essential to the survival of the Klingon Empire, explodes, leaving the homeworld Qo’noS within 50 years or so of becoming completely uninhabitable. Captain Spock, ever the diplomat, volunteers the Enterprise-A and its soon to be retired crew to escort the Klingon Chancellor Gorkon’s flagship to Earth for negotiations with the Federation. Kirk is none too thrilled with this and would rather just let the Klingons die, and says so. Meanwhile, Spock’s protégé,a young Vulcan woman named Valeris, joins the crew and proceeds with Saavik-like grace (more on that later, too). The crew meets the Klingon delegation and appears to open fire on them. Chancellor Gorkon is assassinated and Kirk and McCoy, who had beamed aboard the Klingon ship to help, are arrested and tried and sentenced to life imprisonment on Rura Penthe. They escape with the aid of a shape-shifting alien, and a conspiracy is uncovered, a conspiracy between the old guard of both the Federation and Klingon Empire to make sure that the “good ol’ days” would continue.

As usual, I just give you the bare bones of the story. If you’ve seen it you know what happened and if you haven’t you should experience it for yourself. But there is one thing I have to talk about here that is a bit of a spoiler, because to me there’s one thing that keeps this from being in ST II-III-IV class. Some in the crew weren’t happy with the way their character’s were portrayed, and I have read other Trekkies complain about how bigoted Kirk and some of the Starfleet personnel seem (“You know only top-of-the-line models can even talk, right?”). Nichelle Nicholls was supposed to deliver the line “Guess who’s coming to dinner?” when the Klingons are invited to dine with the crew of the Enterprise but she apparently refused to say it; Koenig said it instead (and I always thought it would have made more sense if Nicholls said it). There were other lines and situations that some of the cast found difficult to handle due to their perceptions of bigotry. And I guess I can see the argument if it is that bigotry shouldn’t exist in the Federation—except that we’ve seen it before in TOS (Mr. Styles in “Balance of Terror” immediately springs to mind, Mr. Chekov in “The Trouble with Tribbles”, too). Beyond that, I’ve always thought actors are hired to act and that’s what they should do.

But that isn’t the thing that bugs me the most about this film. What bothers me most is Valeris. I’ve read that Gene Roddenberry hated the entire story, most likely because he had always tried to give us an idealized future for Man and the bigotry portrayed here didn’t sit well with him. That’s all well and good, but another thing he hated, and it appears he was given his way here, was that he didn’t think that Saavik should be portrayed as being involved in the conspiracy. The Great Bird of the Galaxy apparently thought she was too beloved a character to turn traitor. Problem is, from a storytelling standpoint, Saavik is precisely who should been the “inside man” on the Enterprise: She was in love with Kirk’s son David (in the novelization of The Search for Spock) and watched Klingons murder him for protecting her; she’s half-Romulan, and Romulans have a history of hostility with the Klingons; the audience knew and trusted her implicitly, and knew Spock should as well. She was the perfect traitor—she could have even been rehabilitated afterward; she didn’t have to know the whole plan, just the part about not helping the Klingons. I just don’t understand what GR was thinking here (wish I could still ask him).

Give your rating of Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

Next – Star Trek: Generations



Star Trek U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 Figurine Collection: Star Trek Fan Gift

Movie Review – Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

July 21, 2009 at 6:30 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher | 2 Comments
Tags:

A Review for Non-Harry Potter Geeks

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars

I have never read a single Harry Potter book, nor had I seen a Harry Potter film before this weekend. And, once I sat down and thought about it, I knew surprisingly little about a character which has seemingly taken the world by storm over the past few years. I knew he was a kid who had magic powers and there was a whole mythos built around a school for magic-users, a school that was set up on a far-away mountaintop and filled with secrets and hidden histories as all such mystic places seem to be. I figured there was something special about the young Mr. Potter, something that made him stand out from his classmates—after all, there’s a reason Buffy the Vampire Slayer wasn’t called Cordelia the Homecoming Queen. Oh, and I knew that Harry Potter wore glasses. That’s pretty much it.

But I also knew that the character, in books and film, made a ton of money for J. K. Rowling, the series creator and writer, which is fine because she’s earned every penny of that money. I don’t know much about her personally but the few times I’ve heard or read anything about her she always seems like a really nice lady. Just to show how little attention I’ve paid to such things, I wouldn’t know her if I ran into her somewhere; I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a picture of her. And that’s an odd thing, isn’t it? How many times do you think I’ve mentioned Harlan Ellison, one of the most celebrated writers in America, a man who has won a slew of awards from short story to script-writing, to someone who had never heard of him? Same way here with Rowling. As popular as her work has been, as ubiquitous as one would think her characters and name are, I know next to nothing about her, and if they hadn’t made her books into films I might never have known anything about her at all. And I still haven’t seen the first five films they’ve made from her books.

So there’s the windup, and here’s the pitch: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is a very well-made, fun film filled with magical battles against a seminal darkness along with teenage girl/boy problems. It is a film that shows you it has a past without burying the new viewer in that past. The only real problem I had with the picture at all was—and this isn’t much of a spoiler, even for the non-Potter fan like me—that Harry finds a potion book (think: Chemistry class, with frog’s warts and baby’s breath as ingredients) that had belonged to someone called “The Half-Blood Prince”, and later it is decided that he needs to get rid of it but they never really make it clear why. The Potter-ites sitting around me explained it but that was only because they knew why—even the ones who hadn’t read the books seemed to get it. That was really my only problem at all with the picture, other than the obvious things of not knowing who certain characters were and their relationships. But, like I said, the filmmakers did a good job of not leaving me completely lost.

Sharon and another friend named Billy went with me to this picture and they had both seen the other films. Sharon wasn’t thrilled with this one from the beginning but she got more into it as it went along; Billy thought it was excellent from the beginning. Both of them told me this was a darker picture than the previous films. For myself, I can only say that it made me want to see the earlier films, and perhaps even read the books. It has a very Buffy meets Lord of the Rings sensibility to me—which is not to say it rips off either of those mythos—that makes me want to know more. Which is why, as usual, I haven’t said much about the plot here. This is a film you really should see. (I have been told since watching it that it is radically different from the novel of the same name but I can neither confirm nor deny that assertion.) Enjoy it, and then, if you haven’t, go see the first five films like I’m going to.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Book 7) (Paperback)Buy the Harry Potter Books from Amazon.com up to 40% Off

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Widescreen Edition)Buy the Harry Potter Movies from Amazon.com up to 60% Off

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

July 15, 2009 at 7:03 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Summer of Star Trek | 4 Comments
Tags:

(Continuing our Summer of Star Trek series)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek V - The Final FrontierI know, I know… I know there are people who will see that 3 star rating and start yelling at their computer; I know they’d rather yell at me but I’m not around. I know they’ll complain about the substandard effects, the absurdity of Spock having a brother, the absurdity of a culture based proudly on IDIC—Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations—banishing anyone from their midst for nothing more than a philosophical difference. And then there’s the absurdity of the Enterprise-A being able to reach the center of the galaxy in a few hours. And I know that’s all generally laid at the feet of Shatner, who came up with the original storyline and directed the film. I know these things and can’t really argue much with the sentiments. But consider…

After the great critical and commercial success of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, Paramount decided to pinch pennies on the next installment. When Nick Meyer was unable to write the script for Shatner’s storyline, they wouldn’t pay the money for the director’s choice as screenwriter, Eric Van Lustbader, instead hiring David Loughery for less money. Then Paramount refused to hire Industrial Light and Magic to do the special effects because ILM would have cost too much. It’s easy to say that Paramount just wasn’t sold on Shatner’s story, which would introduce the long-lost brother of Spock as a “televangelist” of sorts and have him convince the crew of the Enterprise to join him in his quest to find God, but if that were the case they should have just rejected the story and went with something else. They told Shatner he could direct the fifth film in the series; I doubt they told him they’d spend 40 million bucks on whatever harebrained idea he came up with. Part of the problem was that Paramount was worried they were squandering the momentum of the fourth film but an extra six months used to come up with an interesting and satisfying story as opposed to dreck is never wasted.

The good points of this film for me are all about the relationship of the Big Three—Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. The scenes of them camping out in Yosemite National Park, with McCoy cursing Kirk’s “playing games with life” (the captain is climbing El Capitan without any precautions, like the jet pack Spock is wearing when we first see him) and then the campfire scenes—Spock and McCoy are priceless here—set the stage for a movie-long gag reel which make this film memorable despite the ridiculous story and events surrounding it. The three actors seem to have a genuine sense of fun at playing off each other and, while some of the humor goes a little over the top, there is such a relaxed atmosphere surrounding them that much of the trouble with the story just melts away when they’re on-screen. And this being Star Trek, you know that’s the vast majority of the film.

Unfortunately, at some point the story always intrudes, and it goes something like this: On Nimbus III, nicknamed “The Planet of Galactic Peace”, Spock’s long-lost brother Sybok uses his “I feel your pain” mind-control to gather a force to capture the Romulan, Klingon, and Federation ambassadors, who he also co-opts into joining him. He does this in the hope that the Federation will send him a Starship so he can get its crew to take him through The Great Barrier at the edge of the gal—oh, wait, that’s where The Great Barrier was in TOS but they moved it for the movies—at the CENTER of the galaxy. Why does he want to go there, you ask? Because that’s where God is, silly. The Enterprise-A is sent to rescue the hostages while a Klingon cruiser is also heading there… I think you get the idea of what happens even if you didn’t see it. Sybok, of course, gets on board the Enterprise-A and hijinks ensue.

The worst parts of the film to me are that Scotty, Uhura, Sulu, and Chekov are largely wasted in this story, as is the Enterprise-A itself. Yes, they all have parts, and, yes, they all have a cute scene or two. But Scotty banging his head on the hatch was just dumb, and the Scotty-Uhura relationship was weird. Not because they have a relationship but, as with the Spock-Uhura thing of the new film, it just kinda came out of nowhere. Chekov and Sulu being lost in the woods was pretty damned funny but there was virtually nothing else in the film to recommend the two. And the ship, having just finished its shakedown cruise, is just in too bad a shape for me to believe Starfleet would have ever let it leave spacedock. The doors don’t work, the alarms malfunction, the transporter doesn’t work—even the pads on which Kirk records his logs don’t work. I just can’t believe any ship in that condition could have been cleared for service.

Despite all of the above, and a lot of other negatives I didn’t mention because I didn’t delve too deeply into the story itself, I enjoyed watching the film. And that’s really all there is to say for any piece of performance art, isn’t it?

Give your rating of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

Next – Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country



Star Trek U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 Figurine Collection: Star Trek Fan Gift

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.