Star Trek: Favorite and Least Favorite Guest Characters from TOS

September 5, 2009 at 8:07 am | In Sam Christopher, Star Trek | 10 Comments
Tags:

(Part of our ongoing series covering all aspects of the Star Trek franchise)

By Sam Christopher

Star Trek, like all the best sf, is more about the characters than the technological advances. Sure, the transporters and warp drive and phasers and replicators are all cool, but it’s the characters that make people tune in. It’s not the Enterprise computer and sensors that people talk about after a show, it’s Mr. Spock’s coolly logical approach to things. It’s not the Universal Translator that people hope to see more of every week, it’s Lt. Uhura. It’s not even the space battles and cool sfx (for the time and budget) that people care about week after week, it’s the interaction of Captain Kirk, Dr. McCoy and Mr. Spock. So I thought it might be fun to take a look at the characters of Star Trek individually, starting this week with The Original Series.

The hard part for me is deciding first on balance. I mean, it’s only right if I’m going to have a Favorite Characters list I should also have a Least Favorites one to go with it. And, with that decided, then we move on to actual numbers. How long a list should I make for each? I’ll settle on five of each for TOS. That’s an easily manageable number. Except… how do I pare down my favorites to just five? I could take the crew of the Enterprise off the table on both lists, or maybe just regular ship’s crew for the series. That frees me from having to decide between Spock, McCoy, Scotty, etc. but still leaves me free to pick Mira Romaine or Gary Mitchell. So that’s what I’ll do. (You do realize, of course, that this could all change with other series. It’s easier to cheat when you make the rules—ask your Congressman.)

5 Favorite Characters from TOS:

5. Trelane, The Squire of Gothos:

If you love Q from TNG (and how many Trekkies don’t?) you have to love TOS’s own version of the character. William Campbell played this role with such a Q-like air that I’ve always thought (although I’ve never heard anyone connected with Trek say it) that John DeLancie was chosen for Q because he reminded GR of Campbell’s turn as Trelane. Later, Peter David would write the novel Q Squared in which he posited that Trelane was a Q. I just always thought it would have made more sense if Trelane and Q were one and the same.

4. Harcourt Fenton Mudd, smuggler/thief

Harry Mudd, who we first meet taking wives to miners on some distant world, is easily the funniest character from TOS. “Mudd’s Women” was all right, establishing him as a con artist willing to do virtually anything to make a buck, but he really rose to the heights in the delirious “I, Mudd”. Here we see him as the “monarch” of a world filled with androids which only want to help humanity. These androids “helped” their builders into extinction evidently and now they have their sights set on the Federation itself. And, in order to gain his freedom from them, Harry Mudd is only too willing to help. This ep simply must be watched.

3. Captain Christopher Pike, former Captain of the Enterprise:

The captain of the ship in the original pilot, “The Cage”, Pike was also seen in the series itself in the two-part episode, “The Menagerie”. In “The Menagerie”, Mr. Spock, the only regular series character to have appeared in “The Cage” (Majel Barrett, who played Nurse Chapel in the series, also appeared in The Cage but as the coldly logical First Officer known only as Number One), steals the Enterprise in order to take his crippled former captain to the only world in the galaxy where Pike can have a chance at a “normal” life. Jeffrey Hunter played Pike in the pilot but the role was played by Sean Kenney in “The Menagerie”, except for footage from “The Cage”. I’ve always enjoyed reading books with this character; he’s different from Kirk but still close.

2. Mr. Spock, First Officer of the ISS Enterprise:

Ah-ah-ah—this Spock was only shown in one episode. This is the Spock we saw in the greatest of all TOS episodes, “Mirror, Mirror”. The strange thing about this character was that while he was harder and a little more ruthless than “our” Spock, they really were essentially the same character. He truly had no desire to command the ship, preferring, he said, to remain a lesser target (officers moved up in rank by assassination). That was in the episode, but in the book Glass Empires (see my review) we see that he did indeed take “our” universe’s Kirk’s advice and take over as captain before moving on to… well, you really should read it.

1. Romulan Commander/ Sarek, Two very different characters played by the same man:

Told you I could cheat. These two characters were both very important in TOS and they were both played by Mark Lenard. The Romulan Commander—and that really is all he’s called in TOS, although the ST CCG has a card and name for him—is in command of the first Romulan ship we ever see and is the first known Romulan to ever be seen in Federation history. Besides, “Balance of Terror” is one of the best TOS eps ever. Sarek, Spock’s father from the ep “Journey to Babel”, is a pivotal character in this episode but becomes more important in the films, and even in TNG where we eventually see his death. In ST III he explains the concept of the katra—in other words “gave us the back dorr through which Spock could return to the storyline”—and in IV he argues with the Klingon Ambassador before the Federation Council. I just love both of these characters.

Now for the hard part…

5 Least Favorite Characters from TOS:

5. Apollo, The Greek God of Light and Irritating Me (evidently):

Okay, maybe this isn’t Apollo’s fault but this episode, Who Mourns for Adonis? (and the first ST ep I ever saw, btw), is one of the worst ever and someone has to answer for it. Besides, Apollo’s bellowing and bleating while trying to force the crew of the Enterprise to worship him really was nerve-wracking after the first, oh, twenty seconds. But the most annoying thing about the episode for me was how they treated Scotty. The Chief Engineer of the Flagship of the Fleet spent the entire episode whining like a love-sick schoolboy and generally acting like a teenager.

4, Gorgan, The Friendly Angel:

I know I’m giving these characters a number and this one is only fourth on this list, but this may be the single worst character ever conceived for any episode of any series of Star Trek. I still have no idea where the hell he was supposed to have come from. What, was he just hanging around that planet for all eternity hoping someone would come along and live there? I know, I know, they probably said on the ep how he got there but, really, who could sit through more than a minute or two of that crap without running screaming out into streets? Just awful.

3. The Space Hippies:

This, to me, is the single worst ep of TOS: “The Way to Eden”. Yeah, yeah, you can whine to me about “Spock’s Brain” and “Is There in Truth No Beauty”? all you want but TWTE has everything that’s dumb and inane about those eps and that horrible hippie sing-along besides. “Headin’ out to Eden, yeah, brother” <shudder> And watching the crew of the Enterprise snapping their fingers to the beat of this… this… AAAARRRGGGHHHHH! I just hate this episode and I blame the Space Hippies for it!

2. Commissioner Ferris:

This is the clown who wanted Kirk to give up the search for Spock, McCoy and others on the shuttlecraft in “Galileo 7″. What, precisely, was so damned important about him getting to wherever it was he needed to go that it would be acceptable to lose seven (if I remember right) members of the crew—including the First Officer, Chief Engineer and Chief Medical Officer—and a shuttlecraft? Of all the self-important, egotistical jerks! I hated this guy from the moment he opened his mouth.

1.    Stiles/ Boma, Two Bigots, No Waiting:

Finally, we have these two, and the reason there are two is that they pretty much perform the same function in two different episodes, that function being to show that as enlightened as Man may have become by the 23rd Century there will still be room for petty bigotry in our hearts. Mr. Stiles comes from a long line of military men, many of whom died in The Romulan War. And when he finds out that Romulans have pointed ears like Vulcans do… well, obviously that means that Mr. Spock is a traitor, a Romulan spy sent to destroy the Enterprise. Kirk, of course, lets him know very quickly how much bigotry the captain will tolerate on his bridge (it’s somewhere in the negative numbers) but that doesn’t keep this clown from making a jackass of himself until Spock risks his life to save Stiles. Then we have Mr. Boma, from the aforementioned “Galileo 7″, who also gives us a study in bigotry as he questions and argues every single decision Spock makes. Later, Diane Duane, in her novel Dreadnought, would show us what happened to Boma after Scotty put him on report for his conduct in this episode: busted out of Starfleet. Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

Well, that’s it. I know there will be argument, and there is a lot of room for argument here. I myself could easily change these lists: how did I leave off the Guardian of Forever or Edith Keeler or Redjac from the favorites list, just off the top of my head. But that’s okay—I enjoy talking Trek whenever I can.

Book Review – Voyages of Imagination: The Star Trek Fiction Companion

August 28, 2009 at 6:30 am | In Book Reviews, Sam Christopher, Star Trek | Leave a Comment
Tags:

(Part of our ongoing series covering all aspects of the Star Trek franchise)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 5 out of 5 Stars (Highest Rating)

In 1966, Gene Roddenberry’s singular vision of a (mostly) peaceful, (mostly) optimistic future for the human race hit the airwaves and began stoking the fires of imagination for coming generations of writers and sf fans. The show has been credited with helping many to aspire to their dreams, with the characters of Mr. Spock, Montgomery Scott, and Lt. Uhura (she had no first name on the show) most often cited as inspirations, and the half-Vulcan Spock having the widest appeal among the masses. A need was seen almost immediately for novelizations of episodes—and by “need” I mean an opportunity for profit—and a series of books by the well-regarded sf author James Blish began hitting the stores in January of ’67. These proved very popular, as did Blish’s original novel Spock Must Die, which was released in 1970. A few years later, though, came the real springboard for what was to follow, when Sondra Marshak and Myrna Culbreath edited, at the behest of GR himself, an anthology of original Star Trek fiction by fans of the show called Star Trek: The New Voyages. The success of this book—along with the momentum of the entire Trek phenomenon—showed the amazing versatility and depth of thought this cancelled show could inspire in its devotees. This realization of profit potential by publishers has led to the publication of nearly 600 works of prose fiction since, and Voyages of Imagination, edited by Jeff Ayers, is a compilation of these titles along with interviews from many of the authors.

The first thing that intrigued me was how many of the authors who use just their initials are women. I remember reading about how Dorothy Fontana was DC Fontana for the credits on the tv show because of some prejudice against women by tv execs (note: I have never heard or read Ms. Fontana herself say that, just people around the show at the time) but I never thought of it in terms of prose publishing. But here we have JA Lawrence (James Blish’s wife Judith Ann with her maiden name), MS (Melinda) Murdock, JM (Jeanne) Dillard, AC (Ann) Crispin, VE (Vicki) Mitchell, to name a few. But I think the best use of initials—at least the most interesting to me—is LA Graf. This started out as four authors from a writers group getting together to do one ST novel.  This group was pared to three by the time that novel (Ice Trap) was published, and further reduced when one of the remaining three (Melissa Crandall, who would author Shell Game on her own) moved away. The last two, Karen Rose Cercone and Julia Ecklar, have gone on to publish several works in different aspects of the STU. The name LA Graf comes from the name of their writers group, which was Let’s All Get Rich And Famous. Not to say that no woman uses her full name as author in Trek, just that the use of initials in lieu of a first name is virtually a completely female phenomenon that I never noticed before reading this book. I’m sure there are valid reasons for this—maybe there’s a little known psychological thing where women just like using initials more than men (and maybe there’s not)—but I found it interesting.

Beyond that, I really cannot do this work justice by covering even a smattering of it in this column. Mr. Ayers has done Trekkies everywhere an immense favor by compiling this list of books and interviewing as many of these authors as he could find and convince to talk to him—which is most of them. You have to remember that virtually all of the Trek writers were Trek fans first. The vast majority of them watched the shows in either first run or in the early waves of syndication, when despite the limited channels available Trek could be seen at least once a day every day.  When these authors talk about the show, they are reminiscing about something they love. On the other hand, some of the authors’ comments, and lack of same, has me wondering. Ann Crispin, when asked about any future Trek projects, stated flatly that she would not be doing any. This could just mean she has enough going on in her own original fiction that she doesn’t have time to play in Roddenberry’s universe anymore—and I try not to read too much into things in print like this. But Vonda N. McIntyre, a great sf writer who handled the novelizations for ST II through ST IV and gave Sulu his canonical (is that really a word?) first name of Hikaru and about whom it is said that writing ST was a lifelong dream come true, refused to comment for the book at all. Again, this could just mean she was busy and didn’t have the time but I thought it strange. I have read a few interviews with Ms. McIntyre and she seems to be none too thrilled with the whole publishing community, so maybe that has something to do with it.

So, when you read this book, you’re probably going to think, “What the h-e-double-hockey-sticks kinda review was that?!?” Like I said, no matter what tack I took on this one it was going to be leaving out so much as to render what I wrote almost useless in conveying the true value of the book. All I can say is, if you’re a Trekkie like me you’ll love it and find it an invaluable resource for finding out about books you haven’t read, as well as communing (in a way) with other Trekkies through the authors comments.  And if you’re not a Trekkie—well, you should be.

Buy Voyages of Imagination: The Star Trek Fiction Companion from Amazon.com

aeShop Science Fiction and Fantasy at the Axiom’s Edge Bazaar:

Great deals on DVDs, Books, Comics, Toys, Collectibles and More. Plus, find more Science Fiction and Fantasy Websites, New Authors, Services, etc.

Revisiting the Movies – Star Trek: Nemesis

August 19, 2009 at 6:46 am | In Movie Reviews, Sam Christopher, Star Trek | 2 Comments
Tags:

(Part of our ongoing series covering all aspects of the Star Trek franchise)

By Sam Christopher

Rating: 2 out of 5 Stars (Give Your Rating)

Star Trek - Nemesis (Widescreen Edition)This film, the last to star the crew of the Enterprise-E, was released in 2002. The product of screenwriter John Logan (from an idea conceived jointly with producer Rick Berman) and director Stuart Baird, neither of whom had any history with Trek, ST: Nemesis, this is the only film in the franchise not to open at #1 in the US box office and very nearly lost money, earning only about $67 Million worldwide on a budget of about $60 Million. Jonathan Frakes, who had directed the two previous installments as well as played Will Riker with this cast for the entire run of the teleseries and through the films, wasn’t asked to direct this one, and has said he would have and that the film would have benefited from his direction over Baird’s. Hard to argue given the result.

The story: The Romulan Senate is slaughtered and the Enterprise-E discovers a ridiculously named Data-type android, B-4, on a desert planet near the Romulan Neutral Zone. The ship is also ordered (by Admiral Kathryn Janeway, no less, in the best cameo the film could really have) on a diplomatic mission to Romulus where they find the new Praetor Shinzon is actually a clone of Picard raised on Remus. Then a bunch of stuff happens and Riker and Troi finally get married (I guess they had to wait for Worf’s gnaw marks on her to heal). Riker also finally accepts a promotion. Oh, yeah, and someone very important dies. Sort of.

Believe me, I understand the above is a short rehash but… this film really irritates me. I didn’t get to see it at the theater because it only lasted a couple of weeks locally, and then only a week at the dollar theater. I finally rented it and didn’t think it was all that bad. But that’s because I tend to view Trek with blinders on, at least at first. This was the last film with the Next Gen crew, very likely the last time we would ever see them all together, and I knew that going in. So when I watched it—well, to misquote another sf franchise I don’t really care for—I wanted to believe! I wanted it to be good, so I willed myself not to see the flaws that I would never allow in another film. Picard’s clone runs Romulus?!? How many Trek writers—or even 15-year-olds—do you think could come up with a better plot device than that? Dorothy Fontana, Tracy Torme, Ann Crispin, Diane Duane, Peter David—any of these and a few hundred other people I could name would have come up with a better story than what we got here. Too bad Edward D. Wood Jr. wasn’t available! B-frakkin’-4?!? Come on!

Funny thing here is that I always say the first film, The Motionless Picture, is my least favorite of the films but I really think after seeing this one again that’s more a function of my not thinking much about that film for so much longer than this one. In other words, it’s not that I like this one better, it’s just that it hasn’t stuck in my craw as long, the wasted opportunity they had here. This could have been a great film. The Romulans are an interesting race that still hasn’t been explored to their fullest in the films and various series. The Klingons became the most interesting race in Trek with the advent of The Next Generation and Worf as a crewmember.  The Romulans could easily have supplanted the Klingons if only this film and the teleseries Enterprise (which featured the Romulans more extensively than any other ST series, despite the fact that the regular cast could never see one) had been handled better. But, in this film, instead of Romulan subversion and cunning we get a human’s clone conquering them in minutes.
But the worst thing this film did was end the franchise in such a way that no one (other than we hardcore Trekkies) would really miss it. Roger Ebert said that while watching it he realized that “Star Trek was over for me”—I doubt he would have said that if the story had been worth watching. All anyone I ever talk to seems to remember is Data’s Superman impersonation—they rarely even remember why it happened, what was going on, what it led to. I’ve never been a fan of handing the franchise over to people who don’t know it and this film is certainly a reinforcement of that thought process. Frakes has said that if he had been in charge of the film it would have done better at the box office and, as I said in the first paragraph, it’s hard to argue with that. Not saying that knowledge of Trek without knowledge of storytelling is good but there are many people (some of whom I mentioned above) who have an abundance of both and I see nothing wrong with making an effort to hire them before someone with no investment in this storied franchise.

Give your rating of Star Trek: First Contact and the movies that preceded it

Previous – Star Trek: Insurrection

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.